Ladder 14th
Record 0W 2L · 0pts
Recent
20-46
v Melbourne Storm
Loss 20-46
Sat 14 Mar · WIN Stadium · Rd 2
14-15
v Canterbury Bulldogs
Loss 14-15
Sat 28 Feb · Allegiant Stadium · Rd 1
Next v Eels · Sun 22 Mar

2026 Trial agains the Knights: What the stats actually say

We’ve all read the headlines. Reed was brilliant, Kerr scored on return, Lawrie was strong off the bench. All of this is true, but the full NRL.com player stats tell an even more interesting story than the highlights package. Let’s take a look at what the numbers back up, where they ask some questions, and the stats nobody’s talking about.

A quick note upfront: this was a development squad. No Flanagan, Atkinson, Gutherson, Cook, Holmes, or Suli. The stats are useful for a look at individual players – but don’t give us insight into how the 2026 first grade lineup will do.

Kade Reed: more than the highlights

Reed’s attacking stat line from the NRL.com Match Centre:

57%

Of the Dragons’ points scored or created by Kade Reed

8
Points
1 try + 2 goals
2
Try Assists
8 more points created
2
Line Break Assists
396m
Kick Metres
90% of halves’ combined
Kicking Game
13
Kicks
2
Bombs
2
Grubbers
1
Forced Dropout
1
Intercept
12
Tackles
Source: NRL.com Match Centre
Dragons 28 def. Knights 18
Trial 1 · Feb 7, 2026 · Jubilee Stadium

The try and the 2 try assists made the headlines. What didn’t: 396 kicking metres from 13 kicks, a 30.5m average. That’s solid for any halfback, let alone an 18-year-old in his first senior start. He owned the kicking game entirely. King-Togia kicked twice for 40 metres all night. Reed also forced a dropout and mixed up his kicking well (2 bombs, 2 grubbers, 1 cross-field kick).

The bit nobody’s writing about: Reed’s defence

But here’s the counterpoint… Reed’s tackle efficiency was 70.59% (12 made, 2 missed, 3 ineffective). King-Togia at five-eighth was at 86.36% (19 tackles, 1 missed, 2 ineffective). There’s definitely some room for improvement there.

He also had 2 handling errors in a 3-minute window (43rd and 46th minute) right when the game was tight. If you’re building a case for Reed in the Vegas 17, the attack numbers are the evidence. If you’re building the case against, it’s the errors and the defence.

Josh Kerr: the try was the least interesting part

It was good to see Kerr back in the Red & White. He crashed over in the 49th minute off a Reed chip kick. But the real story is 31 tackles at 100% efficiency. Zero missed, zero ineffective. That’s a perfect defensive sheet for a prop who also ran for 110 metres and 26 post-contact metres.

Only one other player matched that tackle count (Blake Lawrie, more on him in a second). Kerr did it as the starting prop. For a player returning from injury, that’s exactly what you want to see.

Blake Lawrie: the quiet workhorse

The coverage mentioned Lawrie was “impressive off the bench” and left it there. The numbers fill in the picture:

StatLawrie (#21)
Runs12
Run Metres165
Post Contact Metres54
Tackles31
Tackle Efficiency93.94%
Missed Tackles1
Errors0
Handling Errors0

165 run metres and 54 post-contact metres coming off the bench. The only player who beat Lawrie’s run metres in the entire squad was Mathew Feagai (175m), who started in the centres. And Lawrie did it all while making as many tackles as Kerr.

Zero errors, zero handling errors, and only one missed tackle. From a bench forward. Lawry has trimmed down in the off season, and is looking on track for a solid season.

The stories nobody’s telling

Ryan Couchman had the highest post-contact metres on the team. 156 run metres with 59 PCM (post content metres), a 37.8% PCM rate in his first game back from the ACL tear that wiped his entire 2025. Defenders couldn’t bring him down cleanly. It’s not the kind of stat that hits the reports and highlight reels, but should be.

Hame Sele was just as dominant. 151 run metres, 60 PCM (the highest raw number on the team), 96% tackle efficiency. Between Couchman, Sele, Lawrie, and Kerr, the forward pack carried this game. A promising sign for 2026.

Mathew Feagai grabbed 2 intercepts and also ran for a team-high 175 metres and scored one of the three late tries. With 60% tackle efficiency (6 made, 2 missed, 2 ineffective) the defence is a question mark, but the ability to read plays and create turnovers is a potential game-turner.

The Dragons’ play-the-ball speed was 3.29 seconds to the Knights’ 3.98 seconds. We were consistently getting to the ruck faster, building pressure through tempo and consistency. It’s a team discipline stat, and it was a clear edge on the night.

The bottom line

The mainstream narrative (Reed was the star, Kerr and Lawrie were strong) isn’t. The data backs it up. But the full picture is more nuanced.

Reed’s attacking numbers were excellent but his defence needs work. The forward pack was the real engine of this win. And there are players like Couchman, Sele, and Tu whose contributions aren’t making headlines but should be on Flanagan’s radar heading into Vegas.

One game against a Knights side also fielding a development squad doesn’t give us a full picture of what 2026 will look like. But the individual performances are worth filing away. And it will be interesting to see how the team fare’s when the full squad comes out for the Charity Shield.


Sources:

2026 Watch
After Round 2 · 14 Mar
Season
0W 2L
14th · 0 pts · PD -27
Form
L 14-15 L 20-46
Completion Rate 82%
T1 69%
T2 76%
R1 88%
R2 76%
Season avg: 82% Target: 80%+
Halves TA
(combined)
2
Atkinson 2 · Flanagan 0
Points scored
34
17.0 PPG
Points conceded
61
30.5 PPG
Missed tackles
37
avg per game (30, 44)
Fantasy leader
Cook
144 FP (91 + 53)
Bench MVP
R. Couchman
117 FP (58 + 59)

Red V Nerd

Independent fan site. Not affiliated with NRL, NSWRL, or St George Illawarra Dragons.

Discover more from Red V Nerd

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading